Bitcoin Explained - Illustrated Beginner's Guide

QuarkCoin Cryptocurrency

Quark is a decentralized digital monetary system. It facilitates sending Quarks to Friends, Family Members Online Payments free of charges and charge-backs. Military Grade Encryption. No Bank or Government Control. Quark coins are based on the original idea of Bitcoin but improved, more secure, faster transaction times and zero fees. With improvements to design and security. There is also a greater coin supply with higher block rewards for miners. Quark is fully Open Source.
[link]

Can anyone explain the bitcoin source code?

I have a friend that want to try mining bitcoin and I want to help him. I understand the operating principle of bitcoin, but how come there exists bitcoin and miners (such as cgminer)? Could anyone provide a guide to reading the source code so that I can understand it on a deeper level?
P.S. I tried to look into the make file, but I am not an experienced programmer so I could not understand much, is that the right direction?
submitted by ChunkOfAir to BitcoinBeginners [link] [comments]

Bitcoin Halving Explained (including code analysis)

Bitcoin Halving Explained (including code analysis) submitted by finematics to CryptoCurrencies [link] [comments]

Bitcoin Halving Explained (including code analysis)

Bitcoin Halving Explained (including code analysis) submitted by finematics to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Bitcoin Halving Explained! (+code analysis behind Bitcoin Halving)

Bitcoin Halving Explained! (+code analysis behind Bitcoin Halving) submitted by finematics to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Bitcoin Halving Explained (including code analysis)

Bitcoin Halving Explained (including code analysis) submitted by finematics to CelsiusNetwork [link] [comments]

Bitcoin Halving Explained With Code Example

Bitcoin Halving Explained With Code Example submitted by finematics to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

What Is Bitcoin Halving (May 2020) | The Code Behind Bitcoin Halving Explained

What Is Bitcoin Halving (May 2020) | The Code Behind Bitcoin Halving Explained submitted by finematics to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Ivan on Tech - WOW!! TRUMP QUARANTINE!! Bitcoin, DNA, Code - Programmer explains

Ivan on Tech - WOW!! TRUMP QUARANTINE!! Bitcoin, DNA, Code - Programmer explains submitted by Yanlii to cryptovideos [link] [comments]

The BitCoin Code Review ~ Does bitCoin Code Scam by Steve McKay

The BitCoin Code Review : Is BitCoin Code Scam Software By Steve McKay || You must read this BitCoin Code Review if you ever think about jumping into BitCoin trading. Chances are that the majority of people interested in binary trading will be well aware of the Bitcoin crypto currency.
Product complete : The Bitcoin Code
Niche: Binary Options
Official website : TheBitCoinCode.co
Money-back Promise : 60 Days
Download Free & Get $300 Bonus
Bitcoin Code offers us to join to group of people who makes money by trading with bitcoins. This will guarantee you over $13,000 dollars in every 24 hours. The creator of this trading software allege you will become a millionaire for short period of time and secure your financial future. The Bitcoin Code program is free and it will take a few minutes daily to start trading and enjoy the results. This sounds too good to be true and we decided to investigate Bitcoin Code further.
Who stays behind Bitcoin Code?
Steve McKay claims he design and develop Bitcoin Code trading software. This software brings him over $18 million dollars for the last six weeks. Yea right? We did extensive search about him and all we manage to find is connected only with thebitcoincode.com web page. These crooks missed to say that Steve McKay is a fictitious character! He is fabricated with a stock photo!
Moreover, there is no mention of any company name during this Bitcoin Code video presentation. Anonymous software always should rise red flags! Therefore, we cannot trust this guy with anything he says! This is our first clue that we are dealing with scam here!
If we have to believe the words saying over this text video presentation, Steve McKay develop Bitcoin Code software that will allow clients to trade Bitcoins, without having actually buy Bitcoins. This task was assigned to him by his boss, but after that he disappeared and left the Bitcoin Code software to McKay. Folks, don’t you think this statements sounds like fudges? It is hard to believe that anyone will let you to use something that earns so much money without nothing in return! Not to mention that there isn’t any kind of information what algorithms, principals and formulas Bitcoin Code software is using. Totally foggy!
Disturbing things found!
During our investigation we have found some very suspicious facts. While we watching Bitcoin Code video presentation we found that these crooks are using paid actors and fake testimonials. These people are laying for money. You can hire cheap actors and order them to say anything you want just for $5 – $10 dollars from Fiverr.com. We can call Bitcoin Code fake only for that reason.
Also, Steve McKay claims he made millions using Bitcoin Code software during last six months, but quick search in whois.com database shows, that the registration of thebitcoincode.com domain is on 19th June 2017. That’s clearly says this profits are fabricate. These evidences is enough to confirm we are dealing with scam.
*More Alarming things!
Bitcoin Code promise you $550 dollars, every hour. That’s allegation is absurd. Think a little people, is that possible? There is no software, bot or broker that can promise you only wining. No one can predict what will happen with certain asset on trade market for any given time! Therefore, we cannot accept these claims for true! Another sign for Scam! This software is nothing more than one big fat lie, aims only to drain your money!
Once you fill up the registration form on Bitcoin Code web site you will be force to open an account and fund it with minimum of $250 dollars. Until now all was free. Trading with binary options are starts only with their affiliated broker. And here is the scam. Because in this video demonstration no one mention any broker name, we cannot confirm his legitimacy! Dealing with unregulated brokers is very dangerous and you will never get a withdrawal from them! And because there is no company behind this Bitcoin Code, you cannot file a complaint to authorities when this happen! This is dangerous Scam!
Bitcoin Code Scam Review – Conclusion!
Nothing inside thebitcoincode.com is looking good! That Bitcoin Code is a Scam and does not deserve your time and it is clearly with intention to loot your hard earn money! The crooks behind scams just change the actors, the domains and some names and words here and there, promise fast rewards, almost do nothing except registration, you stay at home and money starts to come to you themselves. If this was true, we all will be millionaires. The real world doesn’t work like that. We simply cannot let you sign up and lose anything with that Bitcoin Code Scam!
Tags: The Bitcoin Code, The Bitcoin Code Review, The Bitcoin Code System, Bitcoin Code App, The Bitcoin Code Scam, The Bitcoin Code Download, The Bitcoin Code Software, The Bitcoin Code Reviews, is bitcoin code legit, bitcoin code software, bitcoin code email, bitcoin code login, bitcoin code reviews, bitcoin code example, The bitcoin code review, bitcoin code explained
submitted by shamausxx to biTcoincod [link] [comments]

WHAT'S HAPPENING TO Bitcoin?! 🔥 Satoshi Early Code Found - Programmer explains - Ivan on Tech

WHAT'S HAPPENING TO Bitcoin?! 🔥 Satoshi Early Code Found - Programmer explains - Ivan on Tech submitted by FluidAttitude to btc [link] [comments]

I (Roger Ver) made a video explaining how Bitcoin's economic code is being damaged by economic illiterates.

I (Roger Ver) made a video explaining how Bitcoin's economic code is being damaged by economic illiterates. submitted by MemoryDealers to btc [link] [comments]

Ivan on Tech - WHAT'S HAPPENING TO Bitcoin?! 🔥 Satoshi Early Code Found - Programmer explains

Ivan on Tech - WHAT'S HAPPENING TO Bitcoin?! 🔥 Satoshi Early Code Found - Programmer explains submitted by Yanlii to cryptovideos [link] [comments]

/u/BashCo explains that if you want to discuss non-Core software on /r/Bitcoin, you must submit a BIP, get a BIP number, wait for peer review, modify BIP, more peer review, start serious coding, start testing, more peer review... then you may discuss it once it is "deemed safe."

BashCo explains that if you want to discuss non-Core software on /Bitcoin, you must submit a BIP, get a BIP number, wait for peer review, modify BIP, more peer review, start serious coding, start testing, more peer review... then you may discuss it once it is submitted by BeijingBitcoins to btc [link] [comments]

Peter Todd explains the high code review standards of Bitcoin Core, how he personally reviewed every single line of Segwit, and how he was just one of many. Compare this to the absolute MEDIOCRITY of the BU team. I will never trust these clowns with my money!

Peter Todd explains the high code review standards of Bitcoin Core, how he personally reviewed every single line of Segwit, and how he was just one of many. Compare this to the absolute MEDIOCRITY of the BU team. I will never trust these clowns with my money! submitted by btcfan8877lol to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Ivan on Tech - 🚨 BITCOIN $9,000 SOON? 🤞 2000 BTC Lost - Trader Dies, Dogecoin Code Review - Programmer explains

Ivan on Tech - 🚨 BITCOIN $9,000 SOON? 🤞 2000 BTC Lost - Trader Dies, Dogecoin Code Review - Programmer explains submitted by Yanlii to cryptovideos [link] [comments]

On the 10th birthday of the Bitcoin network, Arjun Balaji, founder and managing partner at Shomei Capital, explains potential bugs in the code, improved scalability, privacy and fungibility in the top cryptocurrency in 2019, Lightning Network and developer activity on Bitcoin.

On the 10th birthday of the Bitcoin network, Arjun Balaji, founder and managing partner at Shomei Capital, explains potential bugs in the code, improved scalability, privacy and fungibility in the top cryptocurrency in 2019, Lightning Network and developer activity on Bitcoin. submitted by youngrumi to u/youngrumi [link] [comments]

How do I explain to someone who doesn’t know anything about bitcoin that there will never be more than 21 million bitcoins?

So, I was talking to my friends parents about bitcoin today and her dad knows a little something about it but her mom knows nothing. He told me that he owns 1 whole bitcoin which surprised me and I thought was amazing. But, then her mom asked why people buy them. So, we tried to explain to her that it’s a way for people to take control of their money, and to avoid inflation because there will never be more than 21 million Bitcoin. Once they’re all mined, then no more will be added to circulation. She immediately asked “How do you know that? How do you know for 100% certain that more wont be added after those 21 million? Isn’t there some kind of ‘managing group’ that controls what happens and could potentially decide to add more?” (She’s an American businesswoman) Now, I’m not an expert but I’m also not new to bitcoin. I know that there won’t be more than 21 million bitcoins. I know Satoshi Nakamoto didn’t start bitcoin to make money and that its much much more than just an investment or a currency it’s a revolution. It’s a way to take the power away from the system that oppresses us. I know this, but I also don’t know how to explain to her in a way that she’d be able to understand that there’s no “managing group” that’s going to add more bitcoin to make more money after the 21 million are mined. How do I show her proof of this?
Edit: I was way off on my 2028 math 😅 thanks for the correction and all the good answers. I realize now that saying “I’m not new to bitcoin” was extremely overconfident, and though I’ve been involved with bitcoin for many years, I’ve never taken enough time to actually learn what I should have learned a long time ago. I am very much still a grasshopper
submitted by tjknocker to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Comparison between Avalanche, Cosmos and Polkadot

Comparison between Avalanche, Cosmos and Polkadot
Reposting after was mistakenly removed by mods (since resolved - Thanks)
A frequent question I see being asked is how Cosmos, Polkadot and Avalanche compare? Whilst there are similarities there are also a lot of differences. This article is not intended to be an extensive in-depth list, but rather an overview based on some of the criteria that I feel are most important.
For better formatting see https://medium.com/ava-hub/comparison-between-avalanche-cosmos-and-polkadot-a2a98f46c03b
https://preview.redd.it/e8s7dj3ivpq51.png?width=428&format=png&auto=webp&s=5d0463462702637118c7527ebf96e91f4a80b290

Overview

Cosmos

Cosmos is a heterogeneous network of many independent parallel blockchains, each powered by classical BFT consensus algorithms like Tendermint. Developers can easily build custom application specific blockchains, called Zones, through the Cosmos SDK framework. These Zones connect to Hubs, which are specifically designed to connect zones together.
The vision of Cosmos is to have thousands of Zones and Hubs that are Interoperable through the Inter-Blockchain Communication Protocol (IBC). Cosmos can also connect to other systems through peg zones, which are specifically designed zones that each are custom made to interact with another ecosystem such as Ethereum and Bitcoin. Cosmos does not use Sharding with each Zone and Hub being sovereign with their own validator set.
For a more in-depth look at Cosmos and provide more reference to points made in this article, please see my three part series — Part One, Part Two, Part Three
(There's a youtube video with a quick video overview of Cosmos on the medium article - https://medium.com/ava-hub/comparison-between-avalanche-cosmos-and-polkadot-a2a98f46c03b)

Polkadot

Polkadot is a heterogeneous blockchain protocol that connects multiple specialised blockchains into one unified network. It achieves scalability through a sharding infrastructure with multiple blockchains running in parallel, called parachains, that connect to a central chain called the Relay Chain. Developers can easily build custom application specific parachains through the Substrate development framework.
The relay chain validates the state transition of connected parachains, providing shared state across the entire ecosystem. If the Relay Chain must revert for any reason, then all of the parachains would also revert. This is to ensure that the validity of the entire system can persist, and no individual part is corruptible. The shared state makes it so that the trust assumptions when using parachains are only those of the Relay Chain validator set, and no other. Interoperability is enabled between parachains through Cross-Chain Message Passing (XCMP) protocol and is also possible to connect to other systems through bridges, which are specifically designed parachains or parathreads that each are custom made to interact with another ecosystem such as Ethereum and Bitcoin. The hope is to have 100 parachains connect to the relay chain.
For a more in-depth look at Polkadot and provide more reference to points made in this article, please see my three part series — Part One, Part Two, Part Three
(There's a youtube video with a quick video overview of Polkadot on the medium article - https://medium.com/ava-hub/comparison-between-avalanche-cosmos-and-polkadot-a2a98f46c03b)

Avalanche

Avalanche is a platform of platforms, ultimately consisting of thousands of subnets to form a heterogeneous interoperable network of many blockchains, that takes advantage of the revolutionary Avalanche Consensus protocols to provide a secure, globally distributed, interoperable and trustless framework offering unprecedented decentralisation whilst being able to comply with regulatory requirements.
Avalanche allows anyone to create their own tailor-made application specific blockchains, supporting multiple custom virtual machines such as EVM and WASM and written in popular languages like Go (with others coming in the future) rather than lightly used, poorly-understood languages like Solidity. This virtual machine can then be deployed on a custom blockchain network, called a subnet, which consist of a dynamic set of validators working together to achieve consensus on the state of a set of many blockchains where complex rulesets can be configured to meet regulatory compliance.
Avalanche was built with serving financial markets in mind. It has native support for easily creating and trading digital smart assets with complex custom rule sets that define how the asset is handled and traded to ensure regulatory compliance can be met. Interoperability is enabled between blockchains within a subnet as well as between subnets. Like Cosmos and Polkadot, Avalanche is also able to connect to other systems through bridges, through custom virtual machines made to interact with another ecosystem such as Ethereum and Bitcoin.
For a more in-depth look at Avalanche and provide more reference to points made in this article, please see here and here
(There's a youtube video with a quick video overview of Avalanche on the medium article - https://medium.com/ava-hub/comparison-between-avalanche-cosmos-and-polkadot-a2a98f46c03b)

Comparison between Cosmos, Polkadot and Avalanche

A frequent question I see being asked is how Cosmos, Polkadot and Avalanche compare? Whilst there are similarities there are also a lot of differences. This article is not intended to be an extensive in-depth list, but rather an overview based on some of the criteria that I feel are most important. For a more in-depth view I recommend reading the articles for each of the projects linked above and coming to your own conclusions. I want to stress that it’s not a case of one platform being the killer of all other platforms, far from it. There won’t be one platform to rule them all, and too often the tribalism has plagued this space. Blockchains are going to completely revolutionise most industries and have a profound effect on the world we know today. It’s still very early in this space with most adoption limited to speculation and trading mainly due to the limitations of Blockchain and current iteration of Ethereum, which all three of these platforms hope to address. For those who just want a quick summary see the image at the bottom of the article. With that said let’s have a look

Scalability

Cosmos

Each Zone and Hub in Cosmos is capable of up to around 1000 transactions per second with bandwidth being the bottleneck in consensus. Cosmos aims to have thousands of Zones and Hubs all connected through IBC. There is no limit on the number of Zones / Hubs that can be created

Polkadot

Parachains in Polkadot are also capable of up to around 1500 transactions per second. A portion of the parachain slots on the Relay Chain will be designated as part of the parathread pool, the performance of a parachain is split between many parathreads offering lower performance and compete amongst themselves in a per-block auction to have their transactions included in the next relay chain block. The number of parachains is limited by the number of validators on the relay chain, they hope to be able to achieve 100 parachains.

Avalanche

Avalanche is capable of around 4500 transactions per second per subnet, this is based on modest hardware requirements to ensure maximum decentralisation of just 2 CPU cores and 4 GB of Memory and with a validator size of over 2,000 nodes. Performance is CPU-bound and if higher performance is required then more specialised subnets can be created with higher minimum requirements to be able to achieve 10,000 tps+ in a subnet. Avalanche aims to have thousands of subnets (each with multiple virtual machines / blockchains) all interoperable with each other. There is no limit on the number of Subnets that can be created.

Results

All three platforms offer vastly superior performance to the likes of Bitcoin and Ethereum 1.0. Avalanche with its higher transactions per second, no limit on the number of subnets / blockchains that can be created and the consensus can scale to potentially millions of validators all participating in consensus scores ✅✅✅. Polkadot claims to offer more tps than cosmos, but is limited to the number of parachains (around 100) whereas with Cosmos there is no limit on the number of hubs / zones that can be created. Cosmos is limited to a fairly small validator size of around 200 before performance degrades whereas Polkadot hopes to be able to reach 1000 validators in the relay chain (albeit only a small number of validators are assigned to each parachain). Thus Cosmos and Polkadot scores ✅✅
https://preview.redd.it/2o0brllyvpq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=8f62bb696ecaafcf6184da005d5fe0129d504518

Decentralisation

Cosmos

Tendermint consensus is limited to around 200 validators before performance starts to degrade. Whilst there is the Cosmos Hub it is one of many hubs in the network and there is no central hub or limit on the number of zones / hubs that can be created.

Polkadot

Polkadot has 1000 validators in the relay chain and these are split up into a small number that validate each parachain (minimum of 14). The relay chain is a central point of failure as all parachains connect to it and the number of parachains is limited depending on the number of validators (they hope to achieve 100 parachains). Due to the limited number of parachain slots available, significant sums of DOT will need to be purchased to win an auction to lease the slot for up to 24 months at a time. Thus likely to lead to only those with enough funds to secure a parachain slot. Parathreads are however an alternative for those that require less and more varied performance for those that can’t secure a parachain slot.

Avalanche

Avalanche consensus scan scale to tens of thousands of validators, even potentially millions of validators all participating in consensus through repeated sub-sampling. The more validators, the faster the network becomes as the load is split between them. There are modest hardware requirements so anyone can run a node and there is no limit on the number of subnets / virtual machines that can be created.

Results

Avalanche offers unparalleled decentralisation using its revolutionary consensus protocols that can scale to millions of validators all participating in consensus at the same time. There is no limit to the number of subnets and virtual machines that can be created, and they can be created by anyone for a small fee, it scores ✅✅✅. Cosmos is limited to 200 validators but no limit on the number of zones / hubs that can be created, which anyone can create and scores ✅✅. Polkadot hopes to accommodate 1000 validators in the relay chain (albeit these are split amongst each of the parachains). The number of parachains is limited and maybe cost prohibitive for many and the relay chain is a ultimately a single point of failure. Whilst definitely not saying it’s centralised and it is more decentralised than many others, just in comparison between the three, it scores ✅
https://preview.redd.it/ckfamee0wpq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=c4355f145d821fabf7785e238dbc96a5f5ce2846

Latency

Cosmos

Tendermint consensus used in Cosmos reaches finality within 6 seconds. Cosmos consists of many Zones and Hubs that connect to each other. Communication between 2 zones could pass through many hubs along the way, thus also can contribute to latency times depending on the path taken as explained in part two of the articles on Cosmos. It doesn’t need to wait for an extended period of time with risk of rollbacks.

Polkadot

Polkadot provides a Hybrid consensus protocol consisting of Block producing protocol, BABE, and then a finality gadget called GRANDPA that works to agree on a chain, out of many possible forks, by following some simpler fork choice rule. Rather than voting on every block, instead it reaches agreements on chains. As soon as more than 2/3 of validators attest to a chain containing a certain block, all blocks leading up to that one are finalized at once.
If an invalid block is detected after it has been finalised then the relay chain would need to be reverted along with every parachain. This is particularly important when connecting to external blockchains as those don’t share the state of the relay chain and thus can’t be rolled back. The longer the time period, the more secure the network is, as there is more time for additional checks to be performed and reported but at the expense of finality. Finality is reached within 60 seconds between parachains but for external ecosystems like Ethereum their state obviously can’t be rolled back like a parachain and so finality will need to be much longer (60 minutes was suggested in the whitepaper) and discussed in more detail in part three

Avalanche

Avalanche consensus achieves finality within 3 seconds, with most happening sub 1 second, immutable and completely irreversible. Any subnet can connect directly to another without having to go through multiple hops and any VM can talk to another VM within the same subnet as well as external subnets. It doesn’t need to wait for an extended period of time with risk of rollbacks.

Results

With regards to performance far too much emphasis is just put on tps as a metric, the other equally important metric, if not more important with regards to finance is latency. Throughput measures the amount of data at any given time that it can handle whereas latency is the amount of time it takes to perform an action. It’s pointless saying you can process more transactions per second than VISA when it takes 60 seconds for a transaction to complete. Low latency also greatly increases general usability and customer satisfaction, nowadays everyone expects card payments, online payments to happen instantly. Avalanche achieves the best results scoring ✅✅✅, Cosmos with comes in second with 6 second finality ✅✅ and Polkadot with 60 second finality (which may be 60 minutes for external blockchains) scores ✅
https://preview.redd.it/kzup5x42wpq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=320eb4c25dc4fc0f443a7a2f7ff09567871648cd

Shared Security

Cosmos

Every Zone and Hub in Cosmos has their own validator set and different trust assumptions. Cosmos are researching a shared security model where a Hub can validate the state of connected zones for a fee but not released yet. Once available this will make shared security optional rather than mandatory.

Polkadot

Shared Security is mandatory with Polkadot which uses a Shared State infrastructure between the Relay Chain and all of the connected parachains. If the Relay Chain must revert for any reason, then all of the parachains would also revert. Every parachain makes the same trust assumptions, and as such the relay chain validates state transition and enables seamless interoperability between them. In return for this benefit, they have to purchase DOT and win an auction for one of the available parachain slots.
However, parachains can’t just rely on the relay chain for their security, they will also need to implement censorship resistance measures and utilise proof of work / proof of stake for each parachain as well as discussed in part three, thus parachains can’t just rely on the security of the relay chain, they need to ensure sybil resistance mechanisms using POW and POS are implemented on the parachain as well.

Avalanche

A subnet in Avalanche consists of a dynamic set of validators working together to achieve consensus on the state of a set of many blockchains where complex rulesets can be configured to meet regulatory compliance. So unlike in Cosmos where each zone / hub has their own validators, A subnet can validate a single or many virtual machines / blockchains with a single validator set. Shared security is optional

Results

Shared security is mandatory in polkadot and a key design decision in its infrastructure. The relay chain validates the state transition of all connected parachains and thus scores ✅✅✅. Subnets in Avalanche can validate state of either a single or many virtual machines. Each subnet can have their own token and shares a validator set, where complex rulesets can be configured to meet regulatory compliance. It scores ✅ ✅. Every Zone and Hub in cosmos has their own validator set / token but research is underway to have the hub validate the state transition of connected zones, but as this is still early in the research phase scores ✅ for now.
https://preview.redd.it/pbgyk3o3wpq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=61c18e12932a250f5633c40633810d0f64520575

Current Adoption

Cosmos

The Cosmos project started in 2016 with an ICO held in April 2017. There are currently around 50 projects building on the Cosmos SDK with a full list can be seen here and filtering for Cosmos SDK . Not all of the projects will necessarily connect using native cosmos sdk and IBC and some have forked parts of the Cosmos SDK and utilise the tendermint consensus such as Binance Chain but have said they will connect in the future.

Polkadot

The Polkadot project started in 2016 with an ICO held in October 2017. There are currently around 70 projects building on Substrate and a full list can be seen here and filtering for Substrate Based. Like with Cosmos not all projects built using substrate will necessarily connect to Polkadot and parachains or parathreads aren’t currently implemented in either the Live or Test network (Kusama) as of the time of this writing.

Avalanche

Avalanche in comparison started much later with Ava Labs being founded in 2018. Avalanche held it’s ICO in July 2020. Due to lot shorter time it has been in development, the number of projects confirmed are smaller with around 14 projects currently building on Avalanche. Due to the customisability of the platform though, many virtual machines can be used within a subnet making the process incredibly easy to port projects over. As an example, it will launch with the Ethereum Virtual Machine which enables byte for byte compatibility and all the tooling like Metamask, Truffle etc. will work, so projects can easily move over to benefit from the performance, decentralisation and low gas fees offered. In the future Cosmos and Substrate virtual machines could be implemented on Avalanche.

Results

Whilst it’s still early for all 3 projects (and the entire blockchain space as a whole), there is currently more projects confirmed to be building on Cosmos and Polkadot, mostly due to their longer time in development. Whilst Cosmos has fewer projects, zones are implemented compared to Polkadot which doesn’t currently have parachains. IBC to connect zones and hubs together is due to launch Q2 2021, thus both score ✅✅✅. Avalanche has been in development for a lot shorter time period, but is launching with an impressive feature set right from the start with ability to create subnets, VMs, assets, NFTs, permissioned and permissionless blockchains, cross chain atomic swaps within a subnet, smart contracts, bridge to Ethereum etc. Applications can easily port over from other platforms and use all the existing tooling such as Metamask / Truffle etc but benefit from the performance, decentralisation and low gas fees offered. Currently though just based on the number of projects in comparison it scores ✅.
https://preview.redd.it/4zpi6s85wpq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=e91ade1a86a5d50f4976f3b23a46e9287b08e373

Enterprise Adoption

Cosmos

Cosmos enables permissioned and permissionless zones which can connect to each other with the ability to have full control over who validates the blockchain. For permissionless zones each zone / hub can have their own token and they are in control who validates.

Polkadot

With polkadot the state transition is performed by a small randomly selected assigned group of validators from the relay chain plus with the possibility that state is rolled back if an invalid transaction of any of the other parachains is found. This may pose a problem for enterprises that need complete control over who performs validation for regulatory reasons. In addition due to the limited number of parachain slots available Enterprises would have to acquire and lock up large amounts of a highly volatile asset (DOT) and have the possibility that they are outbid in future auctions and find they no longer can have their parachain validated and parathreads don’t provide the guaranteed performance requirements for the application to function.

Avalanche

Avalanche enables permissioned and permissionless subnets and complex rulesets can be configured to meet regulatory compliance. For example a subnet can be created where its mandatory that all validators are from a certain legal jurisdiction, or they hold a specific license and regulated by the SEC etc. Subnets are also able to scale to tens of thousands of validators, and even potentially millions of nodes, all participating in consensus so every enterprise can run their own node rather than only a small amount. Enterprises don’t have to hold large amounts of a highly volatile asset, but instead pay a fee in AVAX for the creation of the subnets and blockchains which is burnt.

Results

Avalanche provides the customisability to run private permissioned blockchains as well as permissionless where the enterprise is in control over who validates the blockchain, with the ability to use complex rulesets to meet regulatory compliance, thus scores ✅✅✅. Cosmos is also able to run permissioned and permissionless zones / hubs so enterprises have full control over who validates a blockchain and scores ✅✅. Polkadot requires locking up large amounts of a highly volatile asset with the possibility of being outbid by competitors and being unable to run the application if the guaranteed performance is required and having to migrate away. The relay chain validates the state transition and can roll back the parachain should an invalid block be detected on another parachain, thus scores ✅.
https://preview.redd.it/li5jy6u6wpq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=e2a95f1f88e5efbcf9e23c789ae0f002c8eb73fc

Interoperability

Cosmos

Cosmos will connect Hubs and Zones together through its IBC protocol (due to release in Q1 2020). Connecting to blockchains outside of the Cosmos ecosystem would either require the connected blockchain to fork their code to implement IBC or more likely a custom “Peg Zone” will be created specific to work with a particular blockchain it’s trying to bridge to such as Ethereum etc. Each Zone and Hub has different trust levels and connectivity between 2 zones can have different trust depending on which path it takes (this is discussed more in this article). Finality time is low at 6 seconds, but depending on the number of hops, this can increase significantly.

Polkadot

Polkadot’s shared state means each parachain that connects shares the same trust assumptions, of the relay chain validators and that if one blockchain needs to be reverted, all of them will need to be reverted. Interoperability is enabled between parachains through Cross-Chain Message Passing (XCMP) protocol and is also possible to connect to other systems through bridges, which are specifically designed parachains or parathreads that each are custom made to interact with another ecosystem such as Ethereum and Bitcoin. Finality time between parachains is around 60 seconds, but longer will be needed (initial figures of 60 minutes in the whitepaper) for connecting to external blockchains. Thus limiting the appeal of connecting two external ecosystems together through Polkadot. Polkadot is also limited in the number of Parachain slots available, thus limiting the amount of blockchains that can be bridged. Parathreads could be used for lower performance bridges, but the speed of future blockchains is only going to increase.

Avalanche

A subnet can validate multiple virtual machines / blockchains and all blockchains within a subnet share the same trust assumptions / validator set, enabling cross chain interoperability. Interoperability is also possible between any other subnet, with the hope Avalanche will consist of thousands of subnets. Each subnet may have a different trust level, but as the primary network consists of all validators then this can be used as a source of trust if required. As Avalanche supports many virtual machines, bridges to other ecosystems are created by running the connected virtual machine. There will be an Ethereum bridge using the EVM shortly after mainnet. Finality time is much faster at sub 3 seconds (with most happening under 1 second) with no chance of rolling back so more appealing when connecting to external blockchains.

Results

All 3 systems are able to perform interoperability within their ecosystem and transfer assets as well as data, as well as use bridges to connect to external blockchains. Cosmos has different trust levels between its zones and hubs and can create issues depending on which path it takes and additional latency added. Polkadot provides the same trust assumptions for all connected parachains but has long finality and limited number of parachain slots available. Avalanche provides the same trust assumptions for all blockchains within a subnet, and different trust levels between subnets. However due to the primary network consisting of all validators it can be used for trust. Avalanche also has a much faster finality time with no limitation on the number of blockchains / subnets / bridges that can be created. Overall all three blockchains excel with interoperability within their ecosystem and each score ✅✅.
https://preview.redd.it/ai0bkbq8wpq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=3e85ee6a3c4670f388ccea00b0c906c3fb51e415

Tokenomics

Cosmos

The ATOM token is the native token for the Cosmos Hub. It is commonly mistaken by people that think it’s the token used throughout the cosmos ecosystem, whereas it’s just used for one of many hubs in Cosmos, each with their own token. Currently ATOM has little utility as IBC isn’t released and has no connections to other zones / hubs. Once IBC is released zones may prefer to connect to a different hub instead and so ATOM is not used. ATOM isn’t a fixed capped supply token and supply will continuously increase with a yearly inflation of around 10% depending on the % staked. The current market cap for ATOM as of the time of this writing is $1 Billion with 203 million circulating supply. Rewards can be earnt through staking to offset the dilution caused by inflation. Delegators can also get slashed and lose a portion of their ATOM should the validator misbehave.

Polkadot

Polkadot’s native token is DOT and it’s used to secure the Relay Chain. Each parachain needs to acquire sufficient DOT to win an auction on an available parachain lease period of up to 24 months at a time. Parathreads have a fixed fee for registration that would realistically be much lower than the cost of acquiring a parachain slot and compete with other parathreads in a per-block auction to have their transactions included in the next relay chain block. DOT isn’t a fixed capped supply token and supply will continuously increase with a yearly inflation of around 10% depending on the % staked. The current market cap for DOT as of the time of this writing is $4.4 Billion with 852 million circulating supply. Delegators can also get slashed and lose their DOT (potentially 100% of their DOT for serious attacks) should the validator misbehave.

Avalanche

AVAX is the native token for the primary network in Avalanche. Every validator of any subnet also has to validate the primary network and stake a minimum of 2000 AVAX. There is no limit to the number of validators like other consensus methods then this can cater for tens of thousands even potentially millions of validators. As every validator validates the primary network, this can be a source of trust for interoperability between subnets as well as connecting to other ecosystems, thus increasing amount of transaction fees of AVAX. There is no slashing in Avalanche, so there is no risk to lose your AVAX when selecting a validator, instead rewards earnt for staking can be slashed should the validator misbehave. Because Avalanche doesn’t have direct slashing, it is technically possible for someone to both stake AND deliver tokens for something like a flash loan, under the invariant that all tokens that are staked are returned, thus being able to make profit with staked tokens outside of staking itself.
There will also be a separate subnet for Athereum which is a ‘spoon,’ or friendly fork, of Ethereum, which benefits from the Avalanche consensus protocol and applications in the Ethereum ecosystem. It’s native token ATH will be airdropped to ETH holders as well as potentially AVAX holders as well. This can be done for other blockchains as well.
Transaction fees on the primary network for all 3 of the blockchains as well as subscription fees for creating a subnet and blockchain are paid in AVAX and are burnt, creating deflationary pressure. AVAX is a fixed capped supply of 720 million tokens, creating scarcity rather than an unlimited supply which continuously increase of tokens at a compounded rate each year like others. Initially there will be 360 tokens minted at Mainnet with vesting periods between 1 and 10 years, with tokens gradually unlocking each quarter. The Circulating supply is 24.5 million AVAX with tokens gradually released each quater. The current market cap of AVAX is around $100 million.

Results

Avalanche’s AVAX with its fixed capped supply, deflationary pressure, very strong utility, potential to receive air drops and low market cap, means it scores ✅✅✅. Polkadot’s DOT also has very strong utility with the need for auctions to acquire parachain slots, but has no deflationary mechanisms, no fixed capped supply and already valued at $3.8 billion, therefore scores ✅✅. Cosmos’s ATOM token is only for the Cosmos Hub, of which there will be many hubs in the ecosystem and has very little utility currently. (this may improve once IBC is released and if Cosmos hub actually becomes the hub that people want to connect to and not something like Binance instead. There is no fixed capped supply and currently valued at $1.1 Billion, so scores ✅.
https://preview.redd.it/mels7myawpq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=df9782e2c0a4c26b61e462746256bdf83b1fb906
All three are excellent projects and have similarities as well as many differences. Just to reiterate this article is not intended to be an extensive in-depth list, but rather an overview based on some of the criteria that I feel are most important. For a more in-depth view I recommend reading the articles for each of the projects linked above and coming to your own conclusions, you may have different criteria which is important to you, and score them differently. There won’t be one platform to rule them all however, with some uses cases better suited to one platform over another, and it’s not a zero-sum game. Blockchain is going to completely revolutionize industries and the Internet itself. The more projects researching and delivering breakthrough technology the better, each learning from each other and pushing each other to reach that goal earlier. The current market is a tiny speck of what’s in store in terms of value and adoption and it’s going to be exciting to watch it unfold.
https://preview.redd.it/dbb99egcwpq51.png?width=1388&format=png&auto=webp&s=aeb03127dc0dc74d0507328e899db1c7d7fc2879
For more information see the articles below (each with additional sources at the bottom of their articles)
Avalanche, a Revolutionary Consensus Engine and Platform. A Game Changer for Blockchain
Avalanche Consensus, The Biggest Breakthrough since Nakamoto
Cosmos — An Early In-Depth Analysis — Part One
Cosmos — An Early In-Depth Analysis — Part Two
Cosmos Hub ATOM Token and the commonly misunderstood staking tokens — Part Three
Polkadot — An Early In-Depth Analysis — Part One — Overview and Benefits
Polkadot — An Early In-Depth Analysis — Part Two — How Consensus Works
Polkadot — An Early In-Depth Analysis — Part Three — Limitations and Issues
submitted by xSeq22x to CryptoCurrency [link] [comments]

SHARE -Explain Bitcoin to my mother? the best video to explain the very basics of Bitcoin! Most mass adopters do NOT want to know about the technical coding.

SHARE -Explain Bitcoin to my mother? the best video to explain the very basics of Bitcoin! Most mass adopters do NOT want to know about the technical coding. submitted by blimy20 to Crypto_Currency_News [link] [comments]

Is Bitcoin Code Centralized? Programmer explains.

Is Bitcoin Code Centralized? Programmer explains. submitted by SimilarAdvantage to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

Ivan on Tech - Is Bitcoin Code Centralized? Programmer explains.

Ivan on Tech - Is Bitcoin Code Centralized? Programmer explains. submitted by Yanlii to cryptovideos [link] [comments]

Is Bitcoin Code Centralized? Programmer explains.

Is Bitcoin Code Centralized? Programmer explains. submitted by Dannage888 to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Is Bitcoin Code Centralized? Programmer explains. How Bitcoin Works Under the Hood - YouTube [ASMR] Bitcoin Source Code Explained What Is A Bitcoin Wallet? - The Best Explanation EVER ... First look at the Bitcoin source code - YouTube

Bitcoin Code is an auto trading software developed by Steve McKay that performs trades with Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies for their users. Bitcoin Code is an automatic trading software that performs trades with cryptocurrencies and Bitcoin for the traders. Bitcoin Code makes crypto trading more accessible to new users all around the world. Bitcoin Code can be explained as one of the oldest auto trading robots developed by Steve McKay in 2016. After cultivating the concept and technology, in 2011, Nakamoto turned over the source code and domains to others in the bitcoin community, and subsequently vanished. (Check out the New Yorker's ... The BitCoin Code Review – It is a Confirmed SCAM! If you have not fallen prey to this scam, then congrats as you made a wise decision. You chose to be vigilant and check Bitcoin Code review on our blog before investing in it. Those experienced in Binary Options trading can look straight through the lies being propagated. The Bitcoin Code software our genius Steve McKay spent a year of his life inventing is nothing but an empty box with a few flashing lights. The software is free for a reason. That’s how they trick you. Before you can begin trading with The Bitcoin Code, you must give them your phone number, open a trading account and deposit a minimum of $250.

[index] [25337] [2754] [25815] [3757] [10026] [25845] [11792] [34966] [16559] [22794]

Is Bitcoin Code Centralized? Programmer explains.

[ASMR] Bitcoin Source Code Explained [ASMR] Bitcoin Source Code Explained. Skip navigation Sign in. Search. Loading... Close. This video is unavailable. Watch Queue Queue. An overview of the Bitcoin protocol, source code, data structures and algorithms. This presentation was delivered at Nova Southeastern University on June 20, 2014 by Chris DeRose of bitcoinfl.org. Verdienmodel vervelende Bitcoin Code advertenties uitgelegd - Duration: 13:37. ... Bitcoin Basics (Part 1) - "Explained For Beginners" - Duration: 24:27. Chris Dunn 911,221 views. Ever wanted to develop altcoins from the bitcoin source code? In this series, I will explain everything there is to know about altcoin development, and the things that you need to know to get ... A somewhat technical explanation of how Bitcoin works. Want more? Check out my new in-depth course on the latest in Bitcoin, Blockchain, and a survey of the ...

#